Rumpelstiltskin’s reporting interface

Rumpelstiltskin If Rumpelstiltskin sold a product to enterprise customers, he would quickly learn a lesson that we learned at my last company: no matter how fantastically his product could spin straw into gold, his sales would also depend on his product’s ability to display and report on every aspect of the spinning process. It doesn’t matter if your product works like magic; if it can’t effectively communicate about the work it is doing, it won’t survive in the enterprise for long.

At TurnTide, we created a product that approached the spam problem in a new way, designed to cooperate with traditional message-by-message spam filters. The Anti-Spam Router used TCP traffic shaping to effectively reach back across the network to the spammers, and limit the rate at which traffic could leave their systems destined for a protected network. The result for customers was great; they had dramatically less spam entering their networks, meaning they saved on infrastructure costs from bandwidth to servers in addition to keeping spam out of the inbox.

The problem we faced was an interesting one… how do we count and report on the traffic that the product keeps out of the network altogether? Traditional spam filters don’t have this problem; they can count and report on all of the messages they receive, process, and mark as spam. We used a few different techniques to report on traffic that was no longer hitting our customers’ networks. We built baseline statistics when the product was initially installed, but before traffic shaping was enabled. We modeled the growth in baseline spam number experienced by the Internet at large. We added a custom reporting engine so that any statistic available to the system could be tracked, measured, compared, graphed and exported.

At the end of the day, these and other features were an effort to make a new kind product report as if it worked like the existing products in the market, since that was how customers had already learned to think about the problem. Since TurnTide really did work very differently from those existing products, reporting using the old metrics was never a perfect fit.

Building innovative products that go after existing markets from a new direction is a good strategy, and its the only way I’d ever want to enter a market as crowded as anti-spam was when we founded TurnTide. Existing markets, however, have established a way of thinking about problems and solutions. The existing vendors have educated the market, defining metrics for success in their own terms based on the structure of their solutions. Products that don’t operate within the expectations set by earlier offerings have some extra work to do; either directly re-educating the market, or trying to fit into the existing metrics until market traction allows for organic change in how people think about the problem. Even with its shortcomings, I’d definitely pick the later approach again.

Comments

  1. Josh Kopelman wrote:

    Well said!

    Welcome to the blogosphere….

    Josh

  2. Toby DiPasquale wrote:

    True enough. This problem is mirrored somewhat by the experiences of the Herman Miller company when they first introduced the Aeron chair we’ve all come to know:

    http://www.officedeals.info/library/aeron-history.htm

    The underlying impedence mismatch between revolutionary product operation and public perception was even more exaggerated in their case and with a lot more R&D money at stake.

    Another great example is that back before the country was totally wired up as it is today, Thomas Edison made a vehement effort to persuade people that AC power was evil and DC power should become the standard instead. He had many patents on DC power and a personal rivalry with Nicola Tesla. He even went so far as to lobby heavily to get prisons to use AC for the electric chair (ostensibly to associate death and danger with AC power in the public conscience).

    Clearly this effort failed however, as AC power is now the default transfer mechanism for almost all everyday draws. And Edison’s job in this task was arguably easier, as:

    * he had no strong incumbent to defeat in AC power (DC came before AC), and
    * AC was an incremental improvement on DC, not a disruptive technology like the TurnTide ASR

    Its not at all simple to find that sweet spot of public education plus integration with the existing zeitgeist that works for your particular situation.

    A recent example that did very well, IMO, was Gmail. Everyone thought they knew what email was supposed to look like, but Google showed that all of the complexity of the standard email interface wasn’t really necessary and that without it, you can provide a much better user experience: cloud-based virtually infinite storage and snappy, desktop-like access from any browser on Earth. Basically, they took the system administration out of email but left enough of the traditional in to make an easy transition for everyone.

  3. Lucinda wrote:

    great to see you’re back in the saddle! and great post - we’re struggling with a variant of this issue at c360 already. you’re right, every innovative approach faces the communication issues of all sorts, and reporting is a key one.
    i’ve subscribed…

  4. Lionel Mirafuente wrote:

    Great Blog!

    I continue to enjoy the effects the product brings to every new opportunity that tries this product. I enjoy selling this product because of the positive change it brings to my customers.

    Your comments on reporting are right on and continues to be my biggest pre and post sales challenge. —but nobody wants to part with the box regardless of the reporting issues.

    I’d be interested to see what you come up with next!

    Best wishes to you and your family!

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.